Scroggins v. Reynolds
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2127
EARL T. SCROGGINS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALICIA REYNOLDS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-978)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Scroggins v. Reynolds, No. CA-05-978 (E.D. Va. Sept.
14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scroggins v. Reynolds (Scroggins v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.