Scroger v. Scroger

68 A.D.3d 1777, 890 N.Y.2d 851
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 1777 (Scroger v. Scroger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scroger v. Scroger, 68 A.D.3d 1777, 890 N.Y.2d 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Memorandum: Respondent husband appeals from an order in this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8 determining that he committed the family offenses of disorderly conduct and criminal mischief against petitioner wife. Contrary to the husband’s contention, the wife established by a preponderance of the evidence that the husband engaged in acts constituting those crimes (see Matter of Harrington v Harrington, 63 AD3d 1618, 1619 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 705 [2009]; Matter of [1778]*1778Danielle S. v Larry R.S., 41 AD3d 1188 [2007]). Family Court’s assessment of the credibility of the witnesses is entitled to great weight, and the court was entitled to credit the testimony of the wife over that of the husband (see Danielle S., 41 AD3d at 1189; Matter of Arlene E. v Ralph E., 17 AD3d 1104 [2005]). Present — Scudder, PJ., Centra, Fahey, Garni and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Lord v. Whitney
2025 NY Slip Op 00587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
PETRIE, PATRICIA v. PETRIE, DONALD
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
MARQUARDT, PAUL D. v. MARQUARDT, URSULA M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
MARQUARDT, URSULA M. v. MARQUARDT, PAUL D.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 1777, 890 N.Y.2d 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scroger-v-scroger-nyappdiv-2009.