Scrima v. Hutchins

849 So. 2d 384, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8777, 2003 WL 21348337
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-3504
StatusPublished

This text of 849 So. 2d 384 (Scrima v. Hutchins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scrima v. Hutchins, 849 So. 2d 384, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8777, 2003 WL 21348337 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and raises three issues. We find no error in the court’s instruction on res ipsa loquitur or the court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for directed verdict. We also find no error in the court’s refusal to set off the settlement between the plaintiff and another defendant, which occurred prior to trial. See D’Angelo v. Fitzmaurice, 832 So.2d 135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (failure to place the co-defendant’s fault before the jury negates any entitlement to a set-off).

AFFIRMED.

STONE, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D'ANGELO v. Fitzmaurice
832 So. 2d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
849 So. 2d 384, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8777, 2003 WL 21348337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scrima-v-hutchins-fladistctapp-2003.