Scribner v. York

Supreme Court of Iowa

Scribner v. York

55 N.W. 10, 89 Iowa 737

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedMay 12, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 N.W. 10 (Scribner v. York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scribner v. York, 55 N.W. 10, 89 Iowa 737 (iowa 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Given, J.

The appellant, Bently Worth, sets up as his defense the decrees as originally entered in the three cases of Bently Worth v. Ira P. Wetmore et al. The record shows that subsequently these decrees were amended by the district court by providing that they should not prejudice the rights of this plaintiff under her prior mortgage. The action of the district court was affirmed on the appeal of said cases to this court. See 87 Iowa 62. As thus amended and affirmed, the appellant’s defense must fail, and the decree of the district court is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Given, J.

The appellant, Bently Worth, sets up as his defense the decrees as originally entered in the three cases of Bently Worth v. Ira P. Wetmore et al. The record shows that subsequently these decrees were amended by the district court by providing that they should not prejudice the rights of this plaintiff under her prior mortgage. The action of the district court was affirmed on the appeal of said cases to this court. See 87 Iowa 62. As thus amended and affirmed, the appellant’s defense must fail, and the decree of the district court is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 N.W. 10, 89 Iowa 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scribner-v-york-iowa-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack