Scribner v. Scribner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scribner v. Scribner

702 So. 2d 235, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229, 1997 WL 672502

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 30, 1997

DocketNo. 97-860

StatusPublished

This text of 702 So. 2d 235 (Scribner v. Scribner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scribner v. Scribner, 702 So. 2d 235, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229, 1997 WL 672502 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

The former husband appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. He raises one issue on appeal which has merit and requires us to remand to the trial court for further findings and reconsideration. We are unable to determine from the record how the amounts of child support and arrearage were calculated and whether these amounts constituted a departure from the child support guidelines. Under these circumstances, it is impossible to conduct adequate appellate review. See Hooper v. Hooper, 681 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We, therefore, reverse and remand for further proceedings on the issue of child support and arrearage. In all other respects, the order of dissolution is affirmed.

JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, Judge.

The former husband appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. He raises one issue on appeal which has merit and requires us to remand to the trial court for further findings and reconsideration. We are unable to determine from the record how the amounts of child support and arrearage were calculated and whether these amounts constituted a departure from the child support guidelines. Under these circumstances, it is impossible to conduct adequate appellate review. See Hooper v. Hooper, 681 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We, therefore, reverse and remand for further proceedings on the issue of child support and arrearage. In all other respects, the order of dissolution is affirmed.

JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 So. 2d 235, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229, 1997 WL 672502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scribner-v-scribner-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack