Scribner v. Holmes
16 Ind. 142, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 52
Opinion
This case was tried on May 16, on which day a motion for a new trial was overruled, exception taken, and leave given to file a bill of exceptions in thirty days. The bill was not filed until July 6. That was too late. A legal public highway, in actual use, is not embraced in a general covenant against incumbrances. It would be unreasonable that it should be. See Rawle on Cov. 141, et seq.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scribner v. Holmes, 16 Ind. 142, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 52 (Ind. 1861).
16 Ind. 142 (Scribner v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schurger v. Moorman
117 P. 122 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1911)
Sisk v. Caswell
112 P. 185 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
Gill v. Ferrin
52 A. 558 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1902)
Clark v. Mossman
78 N.W. 399 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)
Lohmiller v. Indian Ford Water-Power Co.
8 N.W. 601 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1881)
Burk v. Hill
48 Ind. 52 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)
Kutz v. McCune
22 Wis. 628 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1868)
Caldwell v. Bank of Salem
20 Ind. 294 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1863)