Scribner v. Doseman

5 Mich. 283, 1858 Mich. LEXIS 44
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 9, 1858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Coubt held that, in all cases of special motions, notice must be given if the opposite party has appeared in the cause. A plaintiff in error is always in court, and always entitled to notice. Where he does not prosecute his writ by attorney, he is entitled to have notice served upon himself in the manner provided by the Rules. Defendant in error is only entitled to such notice after having appeared.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scribner v. Doseman, 5 Mich. 283, 1858 Mich. LEXIS 44 (Mich. 1858).

5 Mich. 283 (Scribner v. Doseman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. Commissioners of Multnomah County
10 P. 484 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1886)