SC.Read, Inc. v. Seminole County School Board

951 So. 2d 3, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 857, 2007 WL 186799
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2007·No. No. 5D05-1203·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arose out of a proposed agency action in the form of school attendance zone redistricting in Seminole County. Appellants, S.C. Read, Inc. and Jennifer Finch, as parent, legal guardian and next friend of Christopher Brady (collectively “Appellants”), appeal the administrative law judge’s final order dismissing their second amended petition/request for determination of invalidity of proposed rule. We find no reversible error and affirm. In particular, we cannot agree with Appellants’ contention that the Seminole County School Board’s policy J mandated the Board’s adoption, without change, of one of the plan alternatives selected by the core committee.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SC.Read, Inc. v. Seminole County School Board, 951 So. 2d 3, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 857, 2007 WL 186799 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

951 So. 2d 3 (SC.Read, Inc. v. Seminole County School Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cliett v. State
951 So. 2d 3 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)