Scrap, Inc. v. Adams

215 So. 3d 1293, 2017 WL 1906968, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6519
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D16-5757·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek certiorari review of an order consolidating multiple cases for trial. Petitioners have failed to demonstrate that they will be irreparably harmed by the order of consolidation as the order is subject to review on direct appeal. See Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 48 So.3d 976, 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), disapproved on other grounds by Aubin v. Union Carbide Corp., 177 So.3d 489 (Fla. 2015). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., LEWIS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scrap, Inc. v. Adams, 215 So. 3d 1293, 2017 WL 1906968, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6519 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

215 So. 3d 1293 (Scrap, Inc. v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
48 So. 3d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
William P. Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation
177 So. 3d 489 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)