Scrap, Inc., G.S.I. Recycling Inc. v. Richard Adams, Eulaine Adams

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 10, 2017
Docket16-5757
StatusPublished

This text of Scrap, Inc., G.S.I. Recycling Inc. v. Richard Adams, Eulaine Adams (Scrap, Inc., G.S.I. Recycling Inc. v. Richard Adams, Eulaine Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scrap, Inc., G.S.I. Recycling Inc. v. Richard Adams, Eulaine Adams, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

SCRAP, INC., G.S.I. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO RECYCLING, INC., and D&S OF FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND PENSACOLA, INC., DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Petitioners, CASE NO. 1D16-5757

v.

RICHARD ADAMS, EULAINE ADAMS, MALINDA ANDERSON, MARY MATTHEWS, HENRY ATKINS, JACQUELINE ATKINS, LUCY MAE BELL, BETTY BROWN, CLAYTON BROWN, JR., CLAYTON BROWN, III, OSSIE BRUNDRIDGE, CAROL BRUNDRIDGE, MARY CASEY, WILLIE DAVISON, EMMA DAVISON, GIAVANIE PEARSON, MCBETHER HILL, AUDREY HOGAN, LILLIE MAE JOHNSON, DEBORAH LEGRANT, EVELYN LOVETTE, CLINTON MADISON, GERTRUDE ADAMS, EULA MADISON, MARY MCCANN, JOSEPH MILLER, LUCILLE MILLER, CLARENCE SAMPSON, RONNIE SAMPSON, FLOYD PEACOCK, JOHNNIE PEACOCK, ALCONRIC PEAVY, VERONICA POSEY, MARY LOUISE POSTELL, STEPHEN RUSSO, ANNETTE SMITH, VERNA STEPHEN, RONALD STEWART, ANNA STEWART, HUBERT THOMPSON, CAROL THOMPSON, SYLVESTER WASHINGTON, VERNON WASHINGTON, EASTER WELCH, MAGGIE WHITE, FRANKLIN WILLIS, WINDER MAURICE WILLIS, ANTANGILA WILLIS, and BRANDON BARGE,

Respondents.

___________________________/

Opinion filed May 9, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

W. David Jester and Jessica L. Scholl of Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, PLC, Pensacola, and Robert O. Beasley of Litvak, Beasley, & Wilson, LLP, Pensacola, for Petitioners.

No appearances for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek certiorari review of an order consolidating multiple cases for

trial. Petitioners have failed to demonstrate that they will be irreparably harmed by the

order of consolidation as the order is subject to review on direct appeal. See

Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 48 So. 3d 976, 986 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2010), disapproved on other grounds by Aubin v. Union Carbide Corp., 177 So.

3d 489 (Fla. 2015). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., LEWIS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
48 So. 3d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
William P. Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation
177 So. 3d 489 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scrap, Inc., G.S.I. Recycling Inc. v. Richard Adams, Eulaine Adams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scrap-inc-gsi-recycling-inc-v-richard-adams-eulaine-adams-fladistctapp-2017.