Scranton v. Warden State Prison, No. Cv 97-0327117-S (Mar. 13, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Scranton v. Warden State Prison, No. Cv 97-0327117-S (Mar. 13, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4617

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 13, 2000

DocketNo. CV 97-0327117-S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4617 (Scranton v. Warden State Prison, No. Cv 97-0327117-S (Mar. 13, 2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scranton v. Warden State Prison, No. Cv 97-0327117-S (Mar. 13, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4617 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION (To Correct Scrivener's Error) RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS APPELLATE COUNSEL The Court files the attached Corrected Memorandum of Decision to correct an error that appeared at the third line from the bottom on Page 4 of the earlier filed Memorandum of Decision. The scrivener's error is as highlighted as follows: "The habeas court found that the petitioner was not mentally competent at the time he entered his pleas in the underlying criminal proceedings. . ."

The correction made in the attached Corrected Memorandum of Decision reads as follows:

"The habeas court found that the petitioner was not mentallyincompetent at the time he entered his pleas in the underlying criminal proceedings. . ."

BY THE COURT

CARROLL, J. CT 4618

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION (To Correct Scrivener's Error) RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS APPELLATE COUNSEL The Court files the attached Corrected Memorandum of Decision to correct an error that appeared at the third line from the bottom on Page 4 of the earlier filed Memorandum of Decision. The scrivener's error is as highlighted as follows: "The habeas court found that the petitioner was not mentally competent at the time he entered his pleas in the underlying criminal proceedings. . ."

The correction made in the attached Corrected Memorandum of Decision reads as follows:

"The habeas court found that the petitioner was not mentallyincompetent at the time he entered his pleas in the underlying criminal proceedings. . ."

BY THE COURT

CARROLL, J. CT 4618

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scranton-v-warden-state-prison-no-cv-97-0327117-s-mar-13-2000-connsuperct-2000.