Scranton v. Warden State Prison, No. Cv 97-0327117-S (Mar. 13, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4617
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 13, 2000·No. No. CV 97-0327117-S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION (To Correct Scrivener's Error) RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS APPELLATE COUNSEL
The Court files the attached Corrected Memorandum of Decision to correct an error that appeared at the third line from the bottom on Page 4 of the earlier filed Memorandum of Decision. The scrivener's error is as highlighted as follows: "The habeas court found that the petitioner was not mentally competent at the time he entered his pleas in the underlying criminal proceedings. . ."

The correction made in the attached Corrected Memorandum of Decision reads as follows:

"The habeas court found that the petitioner was not mentallyincompetent at the time he entered his pleas in the underlying criminal proceedings. . ."

BY THE COURT

CARROLL, J. CT 4618

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scranton v. Warden State Prison, No. Cv 97-0327117-S (Mar. 13, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4617 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4617 (Scranton v. Warden State Prison, No. Cv 97-0327117-S (Mar. 13, 2000)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.