Scranton, Kolb & Co. v. Rentfrow & Brother
29 Ga. 341
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
We think, that there was evidence enough to support the verdict. And the case was submitted to the jury by the Court tinder a charge very favorable to the plaintiff in error. We cannot say, that the refusal of the new trial by the Court, was an improper exercise of discretion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scranton, Kolb & Co. v. Rentfrow & Brother, 29 Ga. 341 (Ga. 1859).
29 Ga. 341 (Scranton, Kolb & Co. v. Rentfrow & Brother) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clarke v. Woodward
45 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Cary v. Simpson & Harper
82 S.E. 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Swygert Bros. v. Bank of Haralson
79 S.E. 759 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)