Scranton, Kolb & Co. v. Rentfrow & Brother
29 Ga. 341
This text of 29 Ga. 341 (Scranton, Kolb & Co. v. Rentfrow & Brother) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scranton, Kolb & Co. v. Rentfrow & Brother, 29 Ga. 341 (Ga. 1859).
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
We think, that there was evidence enough to support the verdict. And the case was submitted to the jury by the Court tinder a charge very favorable to the plaintiff in error. We cannot say, that the refusal of the new trial by the Court, was an improper exercise of discretion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Clarke v. Woodward
45 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Cary v. Simpson & Harper
82 S.E. 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Swygert Bros. v. Bank of Haralson
79 S.E. 759 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 Ga. 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scranton-kolb-co-v-rentfrow-brother-ga-1859.