SCP (Bermuda), Inc. v. Bermudatel, Ltd.

668 N.E.2d 414, 88 N.Y.2d 872, 645 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 735
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 7, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 668 N.E.2d 414 (SCP (Bermuda), Inc. v. Bermudatel, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SCP (Bermuda), Inc. v. Bermudatel, Ltd., 668 N.E.2d 414, 88 N.Y.2d 872, 645 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 735 (N.Y. 1996).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal from the March 12, 1996 judgment of Supreme Court dismissed upon the ground that the judgment does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Items of relief within a single cause of action cannot be expressly or impliedly severed (see, Burke v Crosson, 85 NY2d 10, 18, n 5; Sontag v Sontag, 66 NY2d 554, 555). Moreover, movant has not demonstrated that [873]*873the counterclaims have been finally determined. Motion for re-argument of motion for leave to appeal denied. [See, 87 NY2d 1056.] Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burke v. Crosson
647 N.E.2d 736 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Sontag v. Sontag
488 N.E.2d 1245 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 N.E.2d 414, 88 N.Y.2d 872, 645 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scp-bermuda-inc-v-bermudatel-ltd-ny-1996.