Scoville v. Dodge

54 Cal. App. 795
California Court of Appeal·Decided September 19, 1921·No. Civ. No. 3623·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

The facts in this case are in all essentials parallel to those shown by the record in Brigden et al. v. Dodge et al., ante, p. 266 [201 Pac. 631]. Pursuant to stipulation, both cases were submitted on the same briefs.

For the same reasons as those stated in the opinion filed in Brigden et al. v. Dodge et al. the judgment herein is affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was- denied by the supreme court on November 17, 1921.

Lennon, J., Sloane, J., and Shurtleff, J., concurred.

Wilbur, J., dissented.

Shaw, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scoville v. Dodge, 54 Cal. App. 795 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921).

54 Cal. App. 795 (Scoville v. Dodge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brigden v. Dodge
201 P. 631 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)