Scoville v. Dodge
This text of 54 Cal. App. 795 (Scoville v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts in this case are in all essentials parallel to those shown by the record in Brigden et al. v. Dodge et al., ante, p. 266 [201 Pac. 631]. Pursuant to stipulation, both cases were submitted on the same briefs.
For the same reasons as those stated in the opinion filed in Brigden et al. v. Dodge et al. the judgment herein is affirmed.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was- denied by the supreme court on November 17, 1921.
Lennon, J., Sloane, J., and Shurtleff, J., concurred.
Wilbur, J., dissented.
Shaw, J., did not participate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Cal. App. 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scoville-v-dodge-calctapp-1921.