Scovil v. Moab Realty Corp.

229 A.D. 756
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is impossible to say upon this record that the plaintiff has not presented a substantial issue to be tried. The ease, therefore, falls within the principle in Lee v. Schmeltzer [ante, p. 206], handed down herewith. The order denying the motion to consolidate with this action an action pending in the City Court brought by the defendant herein against this plaintiff should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Sherman, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scovil v. Moab Realty Corp., 229 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

229 A.D. 756 (Scovil v. Moab Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washer v. Tanner
241 N.E.2d 202 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1968)