Scovel v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Scovel v. Smith

1 Root 300

DecidedAugust 15, 1791

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 300 (Scovel v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scovel v. Smith, 1 Root 300 (Colo. 1791).

Pincite

Opinion

Before the County Court said Smith plead this matter in abatement, and that there were justices of the peace residing and dwelling in said Stamford, who could judge between said parties; and that said proceedings were cora/m non judice. The County Court adjudged said plea to be sufficient; and .for that cause this writ of error was brought. And by this court the judgment is affirmed. See the case of Palmer v. Palmer, determined at Fairfield, August Term, A. D. 1790.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Before the County Court said Smith plead this matter in abatement, and that there were justices of the peace residing and dwelling in said Stamford, who could judge between said parties; and that said proceedings were cora/m non judice. The County Court adjudged said plea to be sufficient; and .for that cause this writ of error was brought. And by this court the judgment is affirmed. See the case of Palmer v. Palmer, determined at Fairfield, August Term, A. D. 1790.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scovel-v-smith-conn-1791.