Scovel v. Pennington County
This text of 278 N.W. 176 (Scovel v. Pennington County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The above-entitled matter is before us upon the motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that controversy has ceased to exist and that all questions involved have become moot.
We are convinced, however, that the judgment of the learned trial court, if left unreversed, will preclude the appellant county as to a matter vital to its rights. Under the settled law of this jurisdiction such a cause has not become moot and should not be disposed of summarily upon motion for dismissal. Clarke et al. v. Beadle County,
The motion is therefore denied.
All the Judges concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 N.W. 176, 66 S.D. 75, 1938 S.D. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scovel-v-pennington-county-sd-1938.