Scovel v. Pennington County

278 N.W. 176, 66 S.D. 75, 1938 S.D. LEXIS 16
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 7, 1938
DocketFile No. 8148.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 N.W. 176 (Scovel v. Pennington County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scovel v. Pennington County, 278 N.W. 176, 66 S.D. 75, 1938 S.D. LEXIS 16 (S.D. 1938).

Opinion

The above-entitled matter is before us upon the motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that controversy has ceased to exist and that all questions involved have become moot.

We are convinced, however, that the judgment of the learned trial court, if left unreversed, will preclude the appellant county as to a matter vital to its rights. Under the settled law of this jurisdiction such a cause has not become moot and should not be disposed of summarily upon motion for dismissal. Clarke et al. v. Beadle County, 40 S.D. 597, 169 N.W. 23; State ex rel. Coolsaet et al. v. City of Veblen et al., 56 S.D. 394, 228 N.W. 802; City of Brookings v. Martinson, 60 S.D. 127, 243 N.W. 915.

The motion is therefore denied.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. Fritzsche
105 N.W.2d 675 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 N.W. 176, 66 S.D. 75, 1938 S.D. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scovel-v-pennington-county-sd-1938.