Home/Washington Supreme Court/Scouse v. Alaska & Yakima Investment Co.

Scouse v. Alaska & Yakima Investment Co.

166 P. 777, 97 Wash. 701, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 1084
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scouse v. Alaska & Yakima Investment Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Wash. 250 →
Washington Supreme Court·Decided August 7, 1917·No. No. 13682·Published

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court still adhere to the opinion heretofore filed herein as reported in 94 Wash. 250, 161 Pac. 1189, and for the reasons there stated, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scouse v. Alaska & Yakima Investment Co., 166 P. 777, 97 Wash. 701, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 1084 (Wash. 1917).

166 P. 777 (Scouse v. Alaska & Yakima Investment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scouse v. Alaska & Yakima Investment Co.
161 P. 1189 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)