Scotty Francis v. Brittany Darby-Francis

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 8, 2017
Docket05-17-00667-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Scotty Francis v. Brittany Darby-Francis (Scotty Francis v. Brittany Darby-Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scotty Francis v. Brittany Darby-Francis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion Filed August 8, 2017

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00667-CV

SCOTTY FRANCIS, Appellant V. BRITTANY DARBY-FRANCIS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-22146

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Francis, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Scotty Francis appeals the trial court’s May 11, 2017 judgment. By postcard dated June

14, 2017, we notified appellant that the Court’s $205 filing fee had not been paid. We instructed

him to pay the fee within ten days and cautioned that the failure to do so might result in dismissal

of his appeal. To date, the filing fee has not been paid.

The clerk’s record was due July 10, 2017. By postcard dated July 11, we notified the

Dallas County District Clerk that the record was overdue and instructed the clerk to file it within

thirty days. The district clerk’s office responded on July 20, 2017, informing us that the clerk’s

record had not been filed because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the fee.

That same day, we sent appellant a letter, instructing him to file, within ten days, written

verification that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the clerk’s record or written documentation that he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We

cautioned appellant that the failure to comply might result in the dismissal of the appeal for want

of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). As of today, the clerk’s record has not been filed

and appellant has not filed a response or otherwise communicated with the Court.

In light of appellant’s failure to comply with this Court’s directives, we dismiss this

appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

170667F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

SCOTTY FRANCIS, Appellant On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-17-00667-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-22146. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, BRITTANY DARBY-FRANCIS, Appellee Justices Francis and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee BRITTANY DARBY-FRANCIS recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant SCOTTY FRANCIS.

Judgment entered August 8, 2017.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scotty Francis v. Brittany Darby-Francis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scotty-francis-v-brittany-darby-francis-texapp-2017.