Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Rickey's Restaurant, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Rickey's Restaurant, Inc.

584 So. 2d 105, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7335, 1991 WL 138883

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 31, 1991

DocketNo. 91-1208

StatusPublished

This text of 584 So. 2d 105 (Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Rickey's Restaurant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Rickey's Restaurant, Inc., 584 So. 2d 105, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7335, 1991 WL 138883 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Scottsdale Insurance Company, in this request for a writ of certiorari, contends that the trial court has departed from the essential requirements of law causing material harm not remediable on appeal by overruling objections to respondent’s request for petitioner’s entire investigative file of the underlying accident claim in this third party bad faith claim. We deny the petition insofar as it concerns documents, investigative files or claims manuals prepared or generated by petitioner relating to the initial claim up until the consent judgment. See Aaron v. Allstate Ins. Co., 559 So.2d 275 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 569 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1990); Stone v. Travelers Ins. Co., 326 So.2d 241 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). We grant the petition insofar as the order requires petitioner to produce claims handling manuals which may have gone into effect after the date of judgment of the underlying claim. See Stone.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Scottsdale Insurance Company, in this request for a writ of certiorari, contends that the trial court has departed from the essential requirements of law causing material harm not remediable on appeal by overruling objections to respondent’s request for petitioner’s entire investigative file of the underlying accident claim in this third party bad faith claim. We deny the petition insofar as it concerns documents, investigative files or claims manuals prepared or generated by petitioner relating to the initial claim up until the consent judgment. See Aaron v. Allstate Ins. Co., 559 So.2d 275 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 569 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1990); Stone v. Travelers Ins. Co., 326 So.2d 241 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). We grant the petition insofar as the order requires petitioner to produce claims handling manuals which may have gone into effect after the date of judgment of the underlying claim. See Stone.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

584 So. 2d 105, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7335, 1991 WL 138883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scottsdale-insurance-co-v-rickeys-restaurant-inc-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack