Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Pinecrest Ltd. Partnership
This text of 739 So. 2d 733 (Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Pinecrest Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the final summary judgment as the trial court properly enforced the insurance policy in accordance with its plain language and entered judgment concerning the attorney’s fee issue in favor of appellees. See Wilson v. Wasser, 562 So.2d 339 (Fla.1990); Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So.2d 52 (Fla.1987); Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Lamm, 218 So.2d 219 (Fla. 3d [734]*734DCA), cert. denied, 225 So.2d 529 (Fla.1969).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 So. 2d 733, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12218, 1999 WL 729107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scottsdale-insurance-co-v-pinecrest-ltd-partnership-fladistctapp-1999.