Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Scotti v. State

Scotti v. State

895 So. 2d 1289, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3957, 2005 WL 673249
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 2005
DocketNo. 5D03-4038
StatusPublished

This text of 895 So. 2d 1289 (Scotti v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scotti v. State, 895 So. 2d 1289, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3957, 2005 WL 673249 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marsdin v. State, 813 So.2d 260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (holding that detective had [1290]*1290probable cause to seize defendant and search defendant’s vehicle where detective instructed anonymous informant when and where drug transaction would take place, and immediately prior to transaction, detective observed defendant leave employment carrying a bag, enter a vehicle matching description given by informant, and drive to location where detective had directed).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, PLEUS and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marsdin v. State
813 So. 2d 260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
895 So. 2d 1289, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3957, 2005 WL 673249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scotti-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.