Scott v. Young

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Scott v. Young

1914 OK 422, 143 P. 36, 43 Okla. 367, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 530

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 15, 1914

Docket5961

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK 422 (Scott v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Young, 1914 OK 422, 143 P. 36, 43 Okla. 367, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 530 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

RIDDLE, J.

Judgment was rendered in this cause in favor of defendant in error, plaintiff below, on the 7th day of July, 1913, at which time plaintiff in error was given 60 days to make and serve case-made. The time expired on the 5th day of September, 1913. On September 6th thereafter .plaintiff in error was granted 60 days’ further extension. Defendant in error has moved to dismiss the appeal, 'upon the ground, among others, that the time which plaintiff in error was given to make and serve case-made expired September 5th, and that the trial *368 court was without power to make the order of extension made on September 6th. The time expired September 5th, and the order made on September 6th was without authority of law and void.

The motion to dismiss upon this ground is therefore sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RIDDLE, J.

Judgment was rendered in this cause in favor of defendant in error, plaintiff below, on the 7th day of July, 1913, at which time plaintiff in error was given 60 days to make and serve case-made. The time expired on the 5th day of September, 1913. On September 6th thereafter .plaintiff in error was granted 60 days’ further extension. Defendant in error has moved to dismiss the appeal, 'upon the ground, among others, that the time which plaintiff in error was given to make and serve case-made expired September 5th, and that the trial *368 court was without power to make the order of extension made on September 6th. The time expired September 5th, and the order made on September 6th was without authority of law and void.

The motion to dismiss upon this ground is therefore sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK 422, 143 P. 36, 43 Okla. 367, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-young-okla-1914.