Scott v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad

60 So. 215, 103 Miss. 522
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 60 So. 215 (Scott v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad, 60 So. 215, 103 Miss. 522 (Mich. 1912).

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The jury having found that appellant’s injury was caused by reason of the negligence of appellee, it thereby became its duty to render such a verdict as would [524]*524fairly compensate liim, not only for bis actual money loss, but also for Ms suffering and disability. Tbe verdict rendered, which was for the sum of one hundred dollars, is so grossly inadequate as to indicate that, in arriving at its verdict, the jury was influenced by passion, prejudice, or corruption.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, in ■ so far as it adjudges the amount of damages to be recovered, but in all other respects will remain and be in full force and effect, and cause remanded for the purpose only of adjudging the amount of damages to be. recovered by appellant.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ries v. Sanders
34 F.R.D. 468 (N.D. Mississippi, 1964)
Faulkner v. Middleton
188 So. 565 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1939)
Burrill v. Rau
121 So. 118 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
White v. McRee
71 So. 804 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)
Yazoo & M. V. R. v. Scott
67 So. 491 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 So. 215, 103 Miss. 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-yazoo-mississippi-valley-railroad-miss-1912.