Scott v. Wells
This text of 99 S.E. 315 (Scott v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court overruled some of the grounds of the demurrer to the petition, but sustained others, and allowed the plaintiff ten days in which to amend her petition so as to meet the grounds sustained. To this ruling no exception was taken, nor is error assigned thereon in the bill of exceptions. ,The plaintiff, within the time allowed, filed an amendment to her petition. However, this amendment failed to meet the objections raised by the sustained grounds of the demurrer, and, there being no further effort to amend the petition, these facts authorized the action of the trial judge in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the case. Albany Phosphate Co. v. Hugger, 4 Ga. App. 775 (62 S. E. 533); Cowart v. Powell, 5 Ga. App. 43 (62 S. E. 664); Central Railway Co. v. Waldo, 6 Ga. App. 840 (65 S. E. 1098) ; John Church Co. v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 13 Ga. App. 827 (80 S. E. 1093) ; Hinson v. Mutual Fertilizer Co., 19 Ga. App. 121 (91 S. E. 241) ; Baker v. City of Atlanta, 22 Ga. App. 483 (96 S. E. 332).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 S.E. 315, 23 Ga. App. 720, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-wells-gactapp-1919.