Scott v. Wells Fargo & Co

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 27, 2003
• Docket: 03-1327
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1327

MICHAEL A. SCOTT; TERRY SCOTT,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-02-789-2)

Submitted: May 8, 2003 Decided: June 27, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Scott, Terry Scott, Appellants Pro Se. Stanley Graves Barr, Jr., KAUFMAN & CANOLES, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael and Terry Scott appeal the district court’s judgment

granting partial summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing

their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm in part for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Scott v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 02-789-2

(E.D. Va., filed Jan. 14, 2003, entered Jan. 15, 2003). Although

the Scotts may have been entitled to amend the complaint as of

right, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), we have reviewed the additional

claims raised in the proposed amended complaint and find the

amendment futile. We also deny the Scotts’ motions for summary

reversal and an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED