Scott v. United Traction Company
150 N.E. 562, 241 N.Y. 576, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 660
This text of 150 N.E. 562 (Scott v. United Traction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scott v. United Traction Company, 150 N.E. 562, 241 N.Y. 576, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 660 (N.Y. 1925).
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Divilion. Held, that the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence was one of fact for the jury.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
150 N.E. 562, 241 N.Y. 576, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-united-traction-company-ny-1925.