Scott v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJanuary 10, 2013
DocketCivil Action No. 2013-0039
StatusPublished

This text of Scott v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Scott v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission, (D.D.C. 2013).

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JAN 1 0 2013 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbi8 Lanet Renee Scott, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ) Civil Action No. 13 UV39 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,) ) Defendant. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to proceed

in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring dismissal of a case when

jurisdiction is found wanting).

Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, alleges that the Securities and Exchange

Commission wrongfully terminated her on November 29,2012, based on the result of a

background investigation that defendant allegedly cited as revealing "dishonest conduct."

Com pl. at 1. Since plaintiff is challenging the alleged non-suitability determination that formed

the basis of her termination, her recourse lies exclusively in the remedial scheme of the Civil

Service Reform Act of 1978, which requires adjudication of such claims by the Office of

Personnel Management, appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board, and judicial review by

the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Fornaro v. James, 416 F.3d 63, 66 (D.C. Cir.

2005). A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: January l__, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fornaro, Carmine v. James, Kay Coles
416 F.3d 63 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-united-states-securities-and-exchange-comm-dcd-2013.