Scott v. United States

33 Ct. Cl. 486, 1898 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 41, 1800 WL 2108
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedMay 31, 1898
DocketIndian Depredations, 960
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 33 Ct. Cl. 486 (Scott v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. United States, 33 Ct. Cl. 486, 1898 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 41, 1800 WL 2108 (cc 1898).

Opinion

Nott, Oh. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The year 1886 witnessed the last Indian war of this country, unless the single battle of Wounded Knee be regarded as a war. On the 4th of September of that year the last -war party of the Apaches surrendered in the Sierra Madre of Mexico to Oaptain Lawton, of the Fourth Cavalry, acting under the immediate orders of General Miles. This surrender closed an active campaign extending over a period of sixteen months. The military forces engaged at the time of the surrender consisted, on the part of the United States, of 42 companies of cavalry and infantry; on the part of our ally, the Republic of Mexico, of 4,000 men; and on the part of the common enemy, the Apaches, of not more than 50 men and a few women. It is a significant fact that neither the annual report of the Secretary of War, nor that of the commanding general, nor that of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, nor that of the officer to whom the surrender was made gives the number of the Indians captured. An unpublished, unprinted, contemporaneous report from General Miles to General Howard gives the number of the prisoners as 22 men, 14 women, and 3 children; but as the number of the Indians who escaped in March, 1886, was then reported by Captain Maus, the officer in charge of them, as 22 men, 13 women, and 2 children, it is supposed by the court that General Miles’s report was intended to refer to those numbers, and that some omission occurred in its telegraphic transmission to General Howard.

[488]*488In our military bistory tliis Indian army will be known as “Gerónimo and bis band.'"' If tbe narrative of tliis Indian’s exploits bad come down to ns in tradition from a former age, it is safe to say that scientific criticism would condemn it as a myth, as an instance of tbe love of tbe exaggerated and superstitious and impossible which dwells in tbe unscientific mind. But the costly record of Gerónimo is one which never can be questioned. His campaign taxed tbe powers of two great civilized governments; it involved a treaty which allowed tbe forces of tbe one to cross tbe frontier of tbe other; it received tbe energy and experience and ability of our two greatest masters of Indian warfare, General Crook and General Miles. Tbe war was waged, on tbe part of the United States at least, with the best military appliances of modern warfare, including steam, electricity, and tbe heliostat; and, more valuable tlian any other element in tbe military case, it was an instance of Apache against Apache, for our troops were led by Apache scouts, who faithfully and heroically served tbe Government. Yet Gerónimo armed bis band with the best of modern breech-loaders and ammunition, and even equipped them with field glasses taken from us, and drew bis supplies from wherever he would, and inflicted incalculable damage on the country of both of bis enemies, and carried on his last campaign successfully for five months. There is not, probably, in the history or traditions or myths of the human race another instance of such prolonged resistance against such tremendous odds.

Moreover, the Indian soldier was successful even in the ending of his campaign; for the surrender of this paltry band involved more prolonged negotiation than the army of Burgoyne at Saratoga or of Lee at Appomattox, and concluded by the granting of terms that the surrender be “as prisoners of Avar to an army in the field” — terms which effectually removed the sagacious savage and his folio Avers beyond the jurisdiction of the civil authorities. The pursuit, too, of Gerónimo is witli-out a precedent. Such is the opinion of General Miles, who led the pursuit of the Nez Perces through a march of more than 1,300 miles. The pursuing forces of the United States marched, though more or less by well-arranged relays, more than 2,000 miles. At midday the troops would be in arid deserts where the thermometer in the shade stood at 120°; at midnight they would scale mountain tops where the thermome[489]*489ter stood below tbe. freezing point; and Captain Lawton, the officer who led the pursuit and achieved the surrender, marched more than 1,000 miles, losing, General Miles says, more than 40 pounds in weight during the pursuit and almost expending life itself in the service of the country.

Gerónimo was not a chief of the Chiricahuas, but simply a born soldier and natural leader of men. The Chiricahuas were a part of the Apache tribe or race, and Geronimo’s band was a part of the insurgent portion of the Ohiricahua band. It was therefore, from a legal point of view, a case of a war by the minority of a minority of a subdivision of a tribe. The Chiricahuas were a minority of the Apaches; the Indians who went on the warpath in May, 1885, were a minority of the Chiricahuas; Gerouimo’s followers were a minority of the hostiles.

In 1885 the Chiricahuas had been placed on a separate reservation, known as the Apache or White Mountain Reservation. In May of that year about 200 of them broke away, led nominally by a chief, but really under the command of Gerónimo, who was not a chief, but simply a great Indian soldier. An active campaign was conducted against them by General Crook, then in command of the department. In. March, 1886, the war party surrendered to General Crook — a conditional surrender. On the 29th of March, while the column of troops and prisoners were moving toward Fort Bowie, the suspicions of Gerónimo of some coming treachery on the part of the whites prompted him, with 22 men, 13 women, and 2 children, to escape. They were immediately upon the warpath, carrying-death and fire and desolation over American and Mexican territory to an extent which is almost incredible.

The difficulties of the Indian situation which confronted General Crook on the 27th of March, 1886, are thus described by himself:

“In reply to your dispatch of March 30, to enable you to clearly understand the situation, it should be remembered that the hostiles had an agreement with Lieutenant Maus that they were to be met by me 25 miles below the line; that no regular troops were to be present. While I was very averse to such an agreement I had to abide by it, as it had already been entered into. We found them in camp on a rocky hill about 500 yards from Lieutenant Maus in.such a position that a thousand men could not have surrounded them with any possibility of capturing them. They were able upon the approach [490]*490of an enemy, being- signaled, to scatter and escape through dozens of ravines and canyons which would shelter them from pursuit until they reached the higher ranges in the vicinity. They were armed to the teeth, having the most improved guns and all the ammunition they could carry. The clothing and other supplies lost in the fight with Crawford had been replaced by new blankets and shirts obtained in Mexico. Lieutenant Mans, with Apache scouts, was camped at the nearest point the hostiles would agree to his approaching. Even had I been disposed to betray the confidence they placed in me it would have been simply an impossibility to get white troops to that point either by day or by night without their knowledge, and had I attempted to do this the whole band would have stampeded back to the mountains. So suspicious were they, that never more than from five to eight of the men came into our camp at one time, and to have attempted the arrest of those would have stampeded the others to the mountains. Even after the march to Bowie began we were compelled to allow them to scatter. They would not march in a body, and had any efforts been made to keep them together they would have broken for the mountains.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Ct. Cl. 486, 1898 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 41, 1800 WL 2108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-united-states-cc-1898.