Scott v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2007·No. 07-6361·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6361

JESSIE C. SCOTT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06- cv-02777-PJM)

Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jessie C. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Ariana Wright Arnold, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jessie C. Scott appeals the district court’s order

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion to return property. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Scott v. United States, No. 8:06-cv-02777-PJM (D. Md.

filed Feb. 23, 2007 & entered Feb. 26, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. United States, (4th Cir. 2007).

Scott v. United States (Scott v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.