Scott v. Trogdon

151 S.E.2d 18, 268 N.C. 574, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1263
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 23, 1966·No. 612·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“(W)hen a trial court sets aside a verdict in its discretion, as here, its action in so doing is not subject to review by appeal to the Supreme Court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion. Walston v. Greene, 246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E. 2d 805; Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N.C. 488, 42 S.E. 936; Brink v. Black, 74 N.C. 329.” Goldston v. Wright, 257 N.C. 279, 125 S.E. 2d 462.

Here, as in Goldston, the record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. The appeal is without substance and will be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Trogdon, 151 S.E.2d 18, 268 N.C. 574, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1263 (N.C. 1966).

151 S.E.2d 18 (Scott v. Trogdon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunn v. Custer
591 S.E.2d 11 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Albrecht v. Dorsett
508 S.E.2d 319 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1998)
Edge v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
337 S.E.2d 672 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Worthington v. Bynum
290 S.E.2d 599 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
Coletrane v. Christian
257 S.E.2d 445 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Goldston v. Chambers
157 S.E.2d 676 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)