Scott v. Town of Bloomfield

246 A.2d 129, 52 N.J. 473, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 254
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 7, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 246 A.2d 129 (Scott v. Town of Bloomfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Town of Bloomfield, 246 A.2d 129, 52 N.J. 473, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 254 (N.J. 1968).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

The Town of Bloomfield leased certain municipal property to the Boys’ Club of Bloomfield for 99 years at a rental of one dollar per year. The action was taken in reliance upon N. J. S. A. 40:60 — 45.3. Plaintiffs, taxpayers of the Town, attacked the validity of the lease and the trial court entered summary judgment in their favor on the ground, among others, that the statute was a special law and unconstitutional because the appropriate preenactment public notification (R. S. 1:6-1) required by Art. IV, § 7, par. 8 of our State Constitution was not given. 94 N. J. Super. 592 (Law Div. 1967). The Appellate Division affirmed, solely on the constitutional ground stated. 98 N. J. Super. 321 (App. Div. 1967). An appeal was then taken to this Court but, before argument, the lease was can-celled by mutual consent of the interested parties. In addition, also before argument, N. J. S. A. 40:60-45.3 was amended by Chapter 261, L. 1968, apparently to meet one of the issues presented on the appeal. We have concluded that the matter should be considered moot, and that the various legal issues raised should not be reached. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without costs to any party.

For dismissal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 6.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
McComas v. Bd. of Educ. of Fayette County
475 S.E.2d 280 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1996)
Davidson Bros. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.
579 A.2d 288 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1990)
Route 15 Associates v. Jefferson Tp.
455 A.2d 518 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
La Fronz v. WEEHAWKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION
395 A.2d 538 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
WOODBURY DAILY TIMES CO. v. Gloucester Cty. Sew. Auth.
376 A.2d 607 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.2d 129, 52 N.J. 473, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-town-of-bloomfield-nj-1968.