Scott v. Tierney
This text of 248 N.W. 573 (Scott v. Tierney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs filed bill to foreclose a land contract and had decree for certain instalments and taxes, not for the whole amount due, and they have appealed.
The contract made in June, 1925, provided:
‘ ‘ The whole amount of four thousand dollars shall be paid with interest on or before five years from the date of this contract,”—
to be paid,-—
“Five hundred dollars on the execution and delivery of this agreement, $200 or more, interest included, November 1, 1926, and $200 or more, interest included, every six months thereafter, with inter *137 est at the rate of six and one-half per cent, per annum, to he paid semi-annually on the whole sum from time to time remaining unpaid. ’ ’
This means that the purchasers are to pay $200 or more every six months, hut the whole amount must he paid on or before five years. As the hill was filed more than five years after the making of the contract, the whole amount was due, and plaintiffs were entitled to decree accordingly.
Reversed, with costs. Plaintiffs may have decree with remand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 N.W. 573, 263 Mich. 136, 1933 Mich. LEXIS 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-tierney-mich-1933.