Scott v. TIAA-CREF

Fourth Circuit

Scott v. TIAA-CREF

542 F. App'x 294

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2013·No. No. 13-1829·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

UNPUBLISHED

PER CURIAM:

Audrey Scott appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. TIAA, No. 3:12-ev-00697-FDW, 2013 WL 2948315 (W.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

UNPUBLISHED

PER CURIAM:

Audrey Scott appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. TIAA, No. 3:12-ev-00697-FDW, 2013 WL 2948315 (W.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Scott v. TIAA-CREF, 542 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

542 F. App'x 294 (Scott v. TIAA-CREF) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related