Scott v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scott v. Thomas

263 A.D. 920, 32 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7369

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 920 (Scott v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Thomas, 263 A.D. 920, 32 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant has appealed from an order of the St. Lawrence Special Term of Supreme Court denying his motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the welfare officer of the town of Canton and that between November 29, 1938, and May 16, 1940, the town, through its welfare department, furnished relief to defendant and to members of defendant’s family for whose support defendant was liable, and that defendant now possesses personal property from which repayment may be had of the sums so advanced. The complaint states a good cause of action. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant has appealed from an order of the St. Lawrence Special Term of Supreme Court denying his motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the welfare officer of the town of Canton and that between November 29, 1938, and May 16, 1940, the town, through its welfare department, furnished relief to defendant and to members of defendant’s family for whose support defendant was liable, and that defendant now possesses personal property from which repayment may be had of the sums so advanced. The complaint states a good cause of action. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 920, 32 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-thomas-nyappdiv-1942.