Scott v. Tharp

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois
DecidedJune 18, 2025
Docket3:21-cv-01653
StatusUnknown

This text of Scott v. Tharp (Scott v. Tharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Tharp, (S.D. Ill. 2025).

Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

JAMAL D. SCOTT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:21-cv-01653-GCS ) KRISTOPHER THARP, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM & ORDER SISON, Magistrate Judge: On June 11, 2025, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 63). As a pro se litigant, Plaintiff is entitled to notice regarding the consequences of failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment. See Timms v. Franks, 953 F.2d 281, 285 (7th Cir. 1992); Lewis v. Faulkner, 689 F.2d 100, 102 (7th Cir. 1982). This is commonly referred to as a Summary Judgment Notice. Although Defendants’ motion includes a notice discussing the consequences of failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment in a manner that complies with Rule 56, it does not address the consequences of failing to respond in a manner that complies with Southern District of Illinois Local Rule 56.1. Accordingly, consistent with Seventh Circuit Authority, and to assist Plaintiff in understanding the summary judgment process, the Court is providing Plaintiff with the requisite Summary Judgment Notice. SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOTICE A defendant has moved for summary judgment against you. That makes the defendant the “movant” and you the “nonmovant.” By moving for summary judgment,

the defendant is arguing that there is no need for a trial because: (1) there is no legitimate disagreement about the important facts of the case; and (2) applying the law to those facts, the defendant wins. The defendant may move for partial summary judgment (meaning only as to some of the claims or issues raised by your complaint) or for summary judgment on all claims. When moving for summary judgment, the defendant must serve

on you and file: 1. A Statement of Material Facts, which is a list of the facts the defendant thinks are true and undisputed. 2. The evidence that supports those facts. 3. A memorandum of law that makes a legal argument about why the defendant wins based on the law and the facts.

There are rules that both lawyers and people without lawyers must follow in moving for or opposing summary judgment. If you do not follow the rules, then the judge may not consider your facts or your arguments. I. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56 AND LOCAL RULE 56.1 Summary judgment is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois also has a Local Rule 56.1. Local Rule 56.1 explains what someone seeking summary judgment must submit and what you need to do to oppose summary judgment. Reading this Notice is not a substitute for reviewing Rule 56 and Local Rule 56.1. You should be familiar with Rule 56 and Local Rule 56.1 before you prepare your

opposition to summary judgment. You will find more information about the summary judgment process in Section II, below. In reviewing this information, please note the following: 1. If you do not respond to the defendant’s summary judgment motion by the applicable deadline, the judge may rule on the motion based solely on what the defendant has to say. 2. Even if you file your own summary judgment motion, you still must respond to the defendant’s summary judgment motion. 3. With few exceptions, the Court will not consider any asserted fact that is not supported with a citation to the record. 4. If you do not specifically dispute a material fact asserted by the defendant, the judge may deem that fact undisputed. 5. The judge may strike any motion or response that does not comply with Rule 56 or with Local Rule 56.1.

II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT PROCESS To respond to the summary judgment motion, you must file a Brief in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Brief must contain: 1. A Response to the defendant’s Statement of Material Facts (see Section A). 2. A Statement of Additional Material Facts (if you want the judge to consider facts not included in the defendant’s Statement of Material Facts) (see Section B). 3. A Memorandum of Law that explains why the defendant is not entitled to summary judgment based on the facts and the law (see Section C). 4. Any evidentiary material not submitted by defendant that supports your Response to the defendant’s Statement of Material Facts or your Statement of Additional Facts (this material should be labeled and filed as exhibits).

Additionally, please note the following: 1. Your brief is due 30 days after service of the Motion for Summary Judgment. 2. Your Brief in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment cannot be longer than 20 pages. Your Response to the Statement of Material Facts and your Statement of Additional Material Facts are not part of this page limit. Also, cover pages, tables of content, tables of authority, signature pages, certificates of service, and exhibits are not part of this page limit. 3. If you do not respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment, the judge may decide that you have admitted the defendant’s Statement of Material Facts are true.

A. Response to Defendant’s Statement of Material Facts A material fact is a fact is one that directly affects a legal issue raised in the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In its motion, the defendant has listed what it thinks are undisputed material facts. Each material fact is stated in a separately numbered paragraph. This is called a “Statement of Material Facts.” For each fact, the defendant must point to evidence —such as affidavits, deposition transcripts, recordings, and other documents—supporting defendant’s claim that the fact is true. You must respond to each of the defendant’s facts, in corresponding numbered paragraphs. If you do not respond to a fact asserted by the defendant, the judge may decide that you have admitted that the fact is true. Your choices for how to respond to each fact are listed below: 1. Admit it. If you agree with a fact, write “Admitted.” If you admit a fact in your response, you cannot later deny that fact in your statement of additional facts or in your legal argument. 2. Dispute it. If you think that a fact is not supported by the evidentiary material cited by the defendant, you should write “Disputed” and then briefly explain why you dispute the fact and cite the specific page(s) of evidence that supports your position. 3. Admit it and Dispute it. If you agree with part of the fact but disagree with another part of the fact, you should write “Admitted in part and Disputed in Part.” You must specify which part is admitted and which part is disputed. Then, briefly explain why you dispute part of the fact and cite the specific page(s) of evidence that supports your position. 4. Not Supported by the Record. If you think the evidence defendant points to does not support the asserted fact, you should write “Not Supported by the Record Citation.” Then briefly explain why the evidence defendant points to does not support the fact. 5. Object. If you think a particular piece of evidence the defendant cites to in support of the asserted fact is inadmissible, you should write “Object.” Then briefly explain the basis for your evidentiary objection. 6. If you dispute a fact and object to the evidence that the defendant cites to support that fact, then you should briefly explain why you dispute the fact and your objection to the evidence. If you object to the defendant’s evidence but do not deny the fact, and the judge overrules your objection, then the judge may consider you to have admitted the fact.

If your response points to evidence that the defendant did not submit, you must include that additional evidence as an exhibit filed and served along with your response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arthur Lewis v. Gordon H. Faulkner
689 F.2d 100 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Estella Timms v. Anthony M. Frank
953 F.2d 281 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott v. Tharp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-tharp-ilsd-2025.