Scott v. Taitano
This text of Scott v. Taitano (Scott v. Taitano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III, Case No. 3:23-CV-00263-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TAITANO, ef ai., ° Defendants. 9 10 On December 19, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF 11| No. 38.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9" Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9" Cir. 13 | 1998) (ECF No. 40). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. 14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to February 14, 15 | 2025, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of 16 | time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to 17 | the court for decision. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 DATED: January 14, 2025 . 20 21 UNITED STATES\MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scott v. Taitano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-taitano-nvd-2025.