Scott v. Stout

3 F. App'x 194
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 18, 2001·No. No. 98-6001·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-Appellant Mack E. Scott has challenged summary judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in favor of Defendant-Appellees the East Tennessee State University (“ETSU”), its Vice-President of Student Affairs, Norman Stout, and former ETSU Student Body President Tonia Martin in his civil rights action commenced pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1985(3), and 2000d.

Upon consideration of the record in its entirety, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, this court concludes that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are correct and in accordance with law.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED for the reasons expressed in Judge Curtis L. Collier’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Stout, 3 F. App'x 194 (6th Cir. 2001).

3 F. App'x 194 (Scott v. Stout) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
398 U.S. 144 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Edelman v. Jordan
415 U.S. 651 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Harlow v. Fitzgerald
457 U.S. 800 (Supreme Court, 1982)
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
473 U.S. 432 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (Supreme Court, 1986)
James Johnson, Jr. v. D. Morel
876 F.2d 477 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
Samad Salehpour v. University of Tennessee
159 F.3d 199 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
Christophel v. Kukulinsky
61 F.3d 479 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
790 F.2d 453 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
Woolsey v. Hunt
932 F.2d 555 (Sixth Circuit, 1991)