Scott v. Stout

Sixth Circuit

Scott v. Stout

3 F. App'x 194

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 18, 2001

DocketNo. 98-6001

StatusPublished

This text of 3 F. App'x 194 (Scott v. Stout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Stout, 3 F. App'x 194 (6th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-Appellant Mack E. Scott has challenged summary judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in favor of Defendant-Appellees the East Tennessee State University (“ETSU”), its Vice-President of Student Affairs, Norman Stout, and former ETSU Student Body President Tonia Martin in his civil rights action commenced pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1985(3), and 2000d.

Upon consideration of the record in its entirety, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, this court concludes that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are correct and in accordance with law.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED for the reasons expressed in Judge Curtis L. Collier’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-Appellant Mack E. Scott has challenged summary judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in favor of Defendant-Appellees the East Tennessee State University (“ETSU”), its Vice-President of Student Affairs, Norman Stout, and former ETSU Student Body President Tonia Martin in his civil rights action commenced pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1985(3), and 2000d.

Upon consideration of the record in its entirety, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, this court concludes that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are correct and in accordance with law.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED for the reasons expressed in Judge Curtis L. Collier’s opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 F. App'x 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-stout-ca6-2001.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack