Scott v. Stockholders' Oil Co.

135 F. 892, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. Stockholders' Oil Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 F. 287
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania·Decided February 24, 1905·No. No. 1·Published

Opinion

HOLLAND, District Judge.

This is -a motion to strike off the plea in abatement to the service of an alias subpoena, for the reason that there were no depositions taken in support of .the piea, in accordance with the rules of this court. There were, however, depositions taken and submitted, but not in accordance with the rules, and the “action of the defendants in this case, as shown by the record, and as stated and practically admitted at the argument, has been such that the plaintiff is entitled to an enforcement of the rules.

Motion to strike off plea in abatement to service of . alias subpoena sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Stockholders' Oil Co., 135 F. 892, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5138 (circtedpa 1905).

135 F. 892 (Scott v. Stockholders' Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.