Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Scott v. State

233 S.W.2d 853

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 15, 1950

DocketNo. 24980

StatusPublished

This text of 233 S.W.2d 853 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. State, 233 S.W.2d 853 (Tex. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction was for burglary, punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty, waiving a jury by written permission of the district attorney and the court, and on his plea of guilty punishment was assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary. Upon sentence being pronounced, appellant excepted and gave notice of appeal to this court. There is no statement of facts or bills of exception in the record. The proceedings all appear regular. Nothing is presented for review, and the judgment is affirmed. ' ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction was for burglary, punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty, waiving a jury by written permission of the district attorney and the court, and on his plea of guilty punishment was assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary. Upon sentence being pronounced, appellant excepted and gave notice of appeal to this court. There is no statement of facts or bills of exception in the record. The proceedings all appear regular. Nothing is presented for review, and the judgment is affirmed. ' ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 S.W.2d 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-texcrimapp-1950.