Scott v. State
158 S.W. 814, 71 Tex. Crim. 41, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 360
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 Tex. Crim. 57 →
Opinions
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of forgery and Ms punishment assessed at two years confinement in the re *42 formatory at Gatesville. No statement of facts, nor bills of exception accompanying the record, there is no ground presented in the motion for a new trial that we can review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. State, 158 S.W. 814, 71 Tex. Crim. 41, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 360 (Tex. 1913).
158 S.W. 814 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Linhart v. State
27 S.W. 260 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1894)
Keith v. State
26 S.W. 412 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1894)
Gardiner v. State
33 Tex. 692 (Texas Supreme Court, 1871)