Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Scott v. State

456 S.W.3d 527, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 255, 2015 WL 1119690

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 2015·No. No. ED 101155·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Scott appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Scott argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him not to testify in his own defense. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information [528] only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Scott appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Scott argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him not to testify in his own defense. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information [528] only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Scott v. State, 456 S.W.3d 527, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 255, 2015 WL 1119690 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

456 S.W.3d 527 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.