Scott v. State

358 S.W.3d 587, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 172, 2012 WL 453740

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kerwin Scott appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Scott’s request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum sét-ting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).