Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Scott v. State

51 S.W.3d 90, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 656, 2001 WL 388751

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 2001·No. No. ED 78277·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James R Scott (“appellant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Marion County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Appellant seeks to vacate his conviction for causing a catastrophe, Section 569.070, RSMo 1986, for which appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and conclude the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James R Scott (“appellant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Marion County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Appellant seeks to vacate his conviction for causing a catastrophe, Section 569.070, RSMo 1986, for which appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and conclude the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Scott v. State, 51 S.W.3d 90, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 656, 2001 WL 388751 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

51 S.W.3d 90 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.