Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Scott v. State

792 S.W.2d 32, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 808, 1990 WL 68145

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 22, 1990

DocketNo. 56187

StatusPublished

This text of 792 S.W.2d 32 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. State, 792 S.W.2d 32, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 808, 1990 WL 68145 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 (now repealed) motion for post conviction relief. As sentence was pronounced and the Rule 27.26 motion filed before January 1, 1988, all proceedings continue to be bound by that rule. Hensley v. State, 753 S.W.2d 88 (Mo.App.E.D.1988).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have- been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI