Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Scott v. State

Scott v. State

134 S.E. 335, 35 Ga. App. 591, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1022
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 14, 1926
Docket17410
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 335 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. State, 134 S.E. 335, 35 Ga. App. 591, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1022 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Beoyles, O. J.

“That an accusation in a city court charged the defendant with an assault, without specifying any act or acts constituting the same, is not good ground of arresting judgment.” Rataree v. State, 62 Ga. 245; Johnson v. State, 90 Ga. 441, 444 (16 S. E. 92).

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eonour. Q. S. Claxion, for plaintiff in error. J. Roy Rowland, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rataree v. State
62 Ga. 245 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)
Johnson v. State
16 S.E. 92 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 335, 35 Ga. App. 591, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-gactapp-1926.