Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Scott v. State

Scott v. State

134 S.E. 335, 35 Ga. App. 591, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1022
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 14, 1926·No. 17410·Published

Opinion

Beoyles, O. J.

“That an accusation in a city court charged the defendant with an assault, without specifying any act or acts constituting the same, is not good ground of arresting judgment.” Rataree v. State, 62 Ga. 245; Johnson v. State, 90 Ga. 441, 444 (16 S. E. 92).

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eonour. Q. S. Claxion, for plaintiff in error. J. Roy Rowland, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. State, 134 S.E. 335, 35 Ga. App. 591, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1022 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

134 S.E. 335 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rataree v. State
62 Ga. 245 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)
Johnson v. State
16 S.E. 92 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)