Scott v. State

112 S.E. 156, 28 Ga. App. 553, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 680
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 9, 1922
Docket13382
StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 156 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. State, 112 S.E. 156, 28 Ga. App. 553, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 680 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The charge of the court when it is read in its entirety was not confusing or misleading, and was not subject to any of the criticisms urged against it. All assignments of error insisted upon have [554]*554been examined, and are without substantial merit. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a now trial.

Decided May 9, 1922. Conviction of voluntary manslaughter; from Heard superior court- — -Judge Hoop. January 25, 1922. M. U. Mooty, C. E. Moore, D. B. Whitaker, for plaintiff in error. W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, S. Holderness, Willis Smith, Smith & Millican, contra.

■Judgment affirmed,

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 S.E. 156, 28 Ga. App. 553, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-gactapp-1922.