Scott v. State
43 S.E. 425, 117 Ga. 14, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 132
Opinion
1. A ground of a motion for a new trial assigning error in the admission of evidence must, to entitle it to consideration, itself show, literally or in substance, what the evidence in question was.
2. Failure to instruct the jury as to the relative value of positive and negative-testimony is not cause for a new trial, in the absence of a proper request to-charge upon that subject.
8. The evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.
■Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. State, 43 S.E. 425, 117 Ga. 14, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 132 (Ga. 1903).
43 S.E. 425 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baker v. State
81 S.E. 805 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Bryan v. Jones
67 S.E. 399 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)