Scott v. State

161 So. 3d 437, 2014 WL 1809688, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6759
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 2014·No. No. 2D13-5411·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1995); Benyard v. Wainwright, 322 So.2d 473 (Fla.1975); Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Fox v. State, 827 So.2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. State, 161 So. 3d 437, 2014 WL 1809688, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6759 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

161 So. 3d 437 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughes v. State
22 So. 3d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Brown v. State
827 So. 2d 1054 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Benyard v. Wainwright
322 So. 2d 473 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Fox v. State
827 So. 2d 377 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)