Scott v. State
114 So. 3d 393, 2013 WL 2221485, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8147
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 2013·No. No. 3D11-2024·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We remand this matter to the trial court for the sole purpose of permitting the trial court to replace the erroneous reference in Scott’s sentence to a nonexistent statutory section. In all other aspects, we summarily affirm.
Affirmed, in part, reversed, in part, and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. State, 114 So. 3d 393, 2013 WL 2221485, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8147 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
114 So. 3d 393 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pleadro J. Scott v. Warden Mr. Ronnie Quinn
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Pleadro J. Scott v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025